按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
born to it。 Their parents have a sort of rule and jurisdiction over them； when they come into the world； and for some time after； but it is but a temporary one。 The bonds of this subjection are like the swaddling clothes they art wrapt up in； and supported by； in the weakness of their infancy： age and reason as they grow up； loosen them； till at length they drop quite off； and leave a man at his own free disposal。 Sec。 56。 Adam was created a perfect man； his body and mind in full possession of their strength and reason； and so was capable； from the first instant of his being to provide for his own support and preservation； and govern his actions according to the dictates of the law of reason which God had implanted in him。 From him the world is peopled with his descendants； who are all born infants； weak and helpless； without knowledge or understanding： but to supply the defects of this imperfect state； till the improvement of growth and age hath removed them； Adam and Eve； and after them all parents were； by the law of nature； under an obligation to preserve； nourish； and educate the children they had begotten； not as their own workmanship； but the workmanship of their own maker； the Almighty； to whom they were to be accountable for them。 Sec。 57。 The law； that was to govern Adam； was the same that was to govern all his posterity； the law of reason。 But his offspring having another way of entrance into the world； different from him； by a natural birth； that produced them
ignorant and without the use of reason； they were not presently under that law； for no body can be under a law； which is not promulgated to him； and this law being promulgated or made known by reason only； he that is not come to the use of his reason； cannot be said to be under this law； and Adam's children； being not presently as soon as born under this law of reason； were not presently free： for law； in its true notion； is not so much the limitation as the direction of a free and intelligent agent to his proper interest； and prescribes no farther than is for the general good of those under that law： could they be happier without it； the law； as an useless thing； would of itself vanish； and that ill deserves the name of confinement which hedges us in only from bogs and precipices。 So that； however it may be mistaken； the end of law is not to abolish or restrain； but to preserve and enlarge freedom： for in all the states of created beings capable of laws； where there is no law； there is no freedom： for liberty is； to be free from restraint and violence from others； which cannot be； where there is no law： but freedom is not； as we are told； a liberty for every man to do what he lists： （for who could be free； when every other man's humour might domineer over him？） but a liberty to dispose； and order as he lists； his person； actions； possessions； and his whole property； within the allowance of those laws under which he is； and therein not to be subject to the arbitrary will of another； but freely follow his own。 Sec。 58。 The power； then； that parents have over their children； arises from that duty which is incumbent on them； to take care of their off…spring； during the imperfect state of childhood。 To inform the mind； and govern the actions of their yet ignorant nonage； till reason shall take its place； and ease them of that trouble； is what the children want； and the parents are bound to： for God having given man an understanding to direct his actions； has allowed him a freedom of will； and liberty of acting； as properly belonging thereunto； within the bounds of that law he is under。 But whilst he is in an estate； wherein he has not understanding of his own to direct his will； he is not to have any will of his own to follow： he that understands for him； must will for him too； he must prescribe to his will； and regulate his actions； but when he comes to the estate that made his father a freeman； the son is a freeman too。 Sec。 59。 This holds in all the laws a man is under； whether natural or civil。 Is a man under the law of nature？ What made him free of that law？ what gave him a free disposing of his property； according to his own will； within the compass of that law？ I answer； a state of maturity wherein he might be supposed capable to know that law； that so he might keep his actions within the bounds of it。 When he has acquired that state； he is presumed to know how far that law is to be his guide； and how far he may make use of his freedom； and so comes to have it； till then； some body else must guide him； who is presumed to know how far the law allows a liberty。 If such a state of reason； such an age of discretion made him free； the same shall make his son free too。 Is a man under the law of England？ What made him free of that law？ that is； to have the liberty to dispose of his actions and possessions according to his own will； within the permission of that law？ A capacity of knowing that law； which is supposed by that law； at the age of one and twenty years； and in some cases sooner。 If this made the father free； it shall make the son free too。 Till then we see the law allows the son to have no will； but he is to be guided by the will of his father or guardian； who is to understand for him。 And if the father die； and fail to substitute a deputy in his trust； if he hath not provided a tutor； to govern his son； during his minority； during his want of understanding； the law takes care to do it； some other must govern him； and be a will to him； till he
hath attained to a state of freedom； and his understanding be fit to take the government of his will。 But after that； the father and son are equally free as much as tutor and pupil after nonage； equally subjects of the same law together； without any dominion left in the father over the life； liberty； or estate of his son； whether they be only in the state and under the law of nature； or under the positive laws of an established government。 Sec。 60。 But if； through defects that may happen out of the ordinary course of nature； any one comes not to such a degree of reason； wherein he might be supposed capable of knowing the law； and so living within the rules of it； he is never capable of being a free man； he is never let loose to the disposure of his own will （because he knows no bounds to it； has not understanding； its proper guide） but is continued under the tuition and government of others； all the time his own understanding is uncapable of that charge。 And so lunatics and ideots are never set free from the government of their parents； children； who are not as yet come unto those years whereat they may have； and innocents which are excluded by a natural defect from ever having； thirdly； madmen； which for the present cannot possibly have the use of right reason to guide themselves； have for their guide； the reason that guideth other men which are tutors over them； to seek and procure their good for them； says Hooker； Eccl。 Pol。 lib。 i。 sec。 7。 All which seems no more than that duty； which God and nature has laid on man； as well as other creatures； to