按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
。 47。 And thus came in the use of money； some lasting thing that men might keep without spoiling； and that by mutual consent men would take in exchange for the truly useful； but perishable supports of life。 Sec。 48。 And as different degrees of industry were apt to give men possessions in different proportions； so this invention of money gave them the opportunity to continue and enlarge them： for supposing an island； separate from all possible commerce with the rest of the world； wherein there were but an hundred families； but there were sheep； horses and cows； with other useful animals； wholsome fruits； and land enough for corn for a hundred thousand times as many； but nothing in the island； either because of its commonness； or perishableness； fit to supply the place of money； what reason could any one have there to enlarge his possessions beyond the use of his family； and a plentiful supply to its consumption； either in what their own industry
produced； or they could barter for like perishable； useful commodities； with others？ Where there is not some thing； both lasting and scarce； and so valuable to be hoarded up； there men will not be apt to enlarge their possessions of land； were it never so rich； never so free for them to take： for I ask； what would a man value ten thousand； or an hundred thousand acres of excellent land； ready cultivated； and well stocked too with cattle； in the middle of the inland parts of America； where he had no hopes of commerce with other parts of the world； to draw money to him by the sale of the product？ It would not be worth the enclosing； and we should see him give up again to the wild common of nature； whatever was more than would supply the conveniencies of life to be had there for him and his family。 Sec。 49。 Thus in the beginning all the world was America； and more so than that is now； for no such thing as money was any where known。 Find out something that hath the use and value of money amongst his neighbours； you shall see the same man will begin presently to enlarge his possessions。 Sec。 50。 But since gold and silver； being little useful to the life of man in proportion to food； raiment； and carriage； has its value only from the consent of men； whereof labour yet makes； in great part； the measure； it is plain； that men have agreed to a disproportionate and unequal possession of the earth； they having； by a tacit and voluntary consent； found out； a way how a man may fairly possess more land than he himself can use the product of； by receiving in exchange for the overplus gold and silver； which may be hoarded up without injury to any one； these metals not spoiling or decaying in the hands of the possessor。 This partage of things in an inequality of private possessions； men have made practicable out of the bounds of society； and without compact； only by putting a value on gold and silver； and tacitly agreeing in the use of money： for in governments； the laws regulate the right of property； and the possession of land is determined by positive constitutions。 Sec。 51。 And thus； I think； it is very easy to conceive； without any difficulty； how labour could at first begin a title of property in the common things of nature； and how the spending it upon our uses bounded it。 So that there could then be no reason of quarrelling about title； nor any doubt about the largeness of possession it gave。 Right and conveniency went together； for as a man had a right to all he could employ his labour upon； so he had no temptation to labour for more than he could make use of。 This left no room for controversy about the title； nor for encroachment on the right of others； what portion a man carved to himself； was easily seen； and it was useless； as well as dishonest； to carve himself too much； or take more than he needed。
CHAP。 VI。
Of Paternal Power。
Sec。 52。 IT may perhaps be censured as an impertinent criticism； in a discourse of this nature； to find fault with words and names； that have obtained in the world： and yet possibly it may not be amiss to offer new ones； when the old are apt to lead men into mistakes； as this of paternal power probably has done； which seems so to place the power of parents over their children wholly in the father； as if the mother had no share in it； whereas； if we consult reason or revelation； we shall find； she hath an equal title。 This may give one reason to ask； whether this might not be more properly called parental power？ for whatever obligation nature and the right of generation lays on children； it must certainly bind them equal to
both the concurrent causes of it。 And accordingly we see the positive law of God every where joins them together； without distinction； when it commands the obedience of children； Honour thy father and thy mother； Exod。 xx。 12。 Whosoever curseth his father or his mother； Lev。 xx。 9。 Ye shall fear every man his mother and his father； Lev。 xix。 3。 Children； obey your parents； &c。 Eph。 vi。 1。 is the stile of the Old and New Testament。 Sec。 53。 Had but this one thing been well considered； without looking any deeper into the matter； it might perhaps have kept men from running into those gross mistakes； they have made； about this power of parents； which； however it might； without any great harshness； bear the name of absolute dominion； and regal authority； when under the title of paternal power it seemed appropriated to the father； would yet have founded but oddly； and in the very name shewn the absurdity； if this supposed absolute power over children had been called parental； and thereby have discovered； that it belonged to the mother too： for it will but very ill serve the turn of those men； who contend so much for the absolute power and authority of the fatherhood； as they call it； that the mother should have any share in it； and it would have but ill supported the monarchy they contend for； when by the very name it appeared； that that fundamental authority； from whence they would derive their government of a single person only； was not placed in one； but two persons jointly。 But to let this of names pass。 Sec。 54。 Though I have said above； Chap。 II。 That all men by nature are equal； I cannot be supposed to understand all sorts of equality： age or virtue may give men a just precedency： excellency of parts and merit may place others above the common level： birth may subject some； and alliance or benefits others； to pay an observance to those to whom nature； gratitude； or other respects； may have made it due： and yet all this consists with the equality； which all men are in； in respect of jurisdiction or dominion one over another； which was the equality I there spoke of； as proper to the business in hand； being that equal right； that every man hath； to his natural freedom； without being subjected to the will or authority of any other man。 Sec。 55。 Children； I confess； are not born in this full state of equality； though they are born to it。 Their parents have a sort of rule and jurisdiction over them； when they come into the