按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
seems no more than that duty； which God and nature has laid on man； as well as other creatures； to preserve their offspring； till they can be able to shift for themselves； and will scarce amount to an instance or proof of parents regal authority。 Sec。 61。 Thus we are born free； as we are born rational； not that we have actually the exercise of either： age； that brings one； brings with it the other too。 And thus we see how natural freedom and subjection to parents may consist together； and are both founded on the same principle。 A child is free by his father's title； by his father's understanding； which is to govern him till he hath it of his own。 The freedom of a man at years of discretion； and the subjection of a child to his parents； whilst yet short of that age； are so consistent； and so distinguishable； that the most blinded contenders for monarchy； by right of fatherhood； cannot miss this difference； the most obstinate cannot but allow their consistency： for were their doctrine all true； were the right heir of Adam now known； and by that title settled a monarch in his throne； invested with all the absolute unlimited power Sir Robert Filmer talks of； if he should die as soon as his heir were born； must not the child； notwithstanding he were never so free； never so much sovereign； be in subjection to his mother and nurse； to tutors and governors； till age and education brought him reason and ability to govern himself and others？ The necessities of his life； the health of his body； and the information of his mind； would require him to be directed by the will of others； and not his own； and yet will any one think； that this restraint and subjection were inconsistent with； or spoiled him of that liberty or sovereignty he had a right to； or gave away his empire to those who had the government of his nonage？ This government over him only prepared him the better and sooner for it。 If any body should ask me； when my son is of age to be free？ I shall answer； just when his monarch is of age to govern。 But at what time； says the judicious Hooker； Eccl。 Pol。 l。 i。 sect。 6。 a man may be said to have attained so far forth the use of reason； as sufficeth to make him capable of those laws whereby he is then bound to guide his actions： this is a great deal more easy for sense to discern； than for any one by skill and learning to determine。 Sec。 62。 Common…wealths themselves take notice of； and allow； that there is a time when men are to begin to act like
free men； and therefore till that time require not oaths of fealty； or allegiance； or other public owning of； or submission to the government of their countries。 Sec。 63。 The freedom then of man； and liberty of acting according to his own will； is grounded on his having reason； which is able to instruct him in that law he is to govern himself by； and make him know how far he is left to the freedom of his own will。 To turn him loose to an unrestrained liberty； before he has reason to guide him； is not the allowing him the privilege of his nature to be free； but to thrust him out amongst brutes； and abandon him to a state as wretched； and as much beneath that of a man； as their's。 This is that which puts the authority into the parents hands to govern the minority of their children。 God hath made it their business to employ this care on their offspring； and hath placed in them suitable inclinations of tenderness and concern to temper this power； to apply it； as his wisdom designed it； to the children's good； as long as they should need to be under it。 Sec。 64。 But what reason can hence advance this care of the parents due to their off…spring into an absolute arbitrary dominion of the father； whose power reaches no farther； than by such a discipline； as he finds most effectual； to give such strength and health to their bodies； such vigour and rectitude to their minds； as may best fit his children to be most useful to themselves and others； and； if it be necessary to his condition； to make them work； when they are able； for their own subsistence。 But in this power the mother too has her share with the father。 Sec。 65。 Nay； this power so little belongs to the father by any peculiar right of nature； but only as he is guardian of his children； that when he quits his care of them； he loses his power over them； which goes along with their nourishment and education； to which it is inseparably annexed； and it belongs as much to the foster…father of an exposed child； as to the natural father of another。 So little power does the bare act of begetting give a man over his issue； if all his care ends there； and this be all the title he hath to the name and authority of a father。 And what will become of this paternal power in that part of the world； where one woman hath more than one husband at a time？ or in those parts of America； where； when the husband and wife part； which happens frequently； the children are all left to the mother； follow her； and are wholly under her care and provision？ If the father die whilst the children are young； do they not naturally every where owe the same obedience to their mother； during their minority； as to their father were he alive？ and will any one say； that the mother hath a legislative power over her children？ that she can make standing rules； which shall be of perpetual obligation； by which they ought to regulate all the concerns of their property； and bound their liberty all the course of their lives？ or can she inforce the observation of them with capital punishments？ for this is the proper power of the magistrate； of which the father hath not so much as the shadow。 His command over his children is but temporary； and reaches not their life or property： it is but a help to the weakness and imperfection of their nonage； a discipline necessary to their education： and though a father may dispose of his own possessions as he pleases； when his children are out of danger of perishing for want； yet his power extends not to the lives or goods； which either their own industry； or another's bounty has made their's； nor to their liberty neither； when they are once arrived to the infranchisement of the years of discretion。 The father's empire then ceases； and he can from thence forwards no more dispose of the liberty of his son； than that of any other man： and it must be far from an absolute or perpetual jurisdiction； from which a man may withdraw himself； having license from divine
authority to leave father and mother； and cleave to his wife。 Sec。 66。 But though there be a time when a child comes to be as free from subjection to the will and command of his father； as the father himself is free from subjection to the will of any body else； and they are each under no other restraint； but that which is common to them both； whether it be the law of nature； or municipal law of their country； yet this freedom exempts not a son from that honour which he ought； by the law of God and nature； to pay his parents。 God having made the parents instruments in his great design of continuing the race of mankind； and the occasion