按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
ion will be almost impossible when it concerns revelations on the subject of the dead man's private deeds and actions； which are unknown to any living person or else communication will be established not with the deceased； but with the living person； who necessarily knows the facts which he is called upon to confirm。 As Dr。 Osty very rightly says：
〃The conditions are then those of perception by the intermediary of the thoughts of a living person； and the deceased is perceived through a mental representation。 The experiment； for this reason； is valueless as evidence of the reality of retrospective psychometry and consequently of the recording part played by the object。
〃The only class of experiment that could be of value from this point of view； would be that in which confirmation would come subsequently from documents whose contents remained unknown to any living person until after the clairvoyance sitting。 It might then be proved that the object can latently register the human personalities which have touched it and that it is sufficient in itself to allow of a mental reconstruction of those personalities through the interpretation of the register by a clairvoyant or psychometer。〃
5
It may be imagined that experiments of this sort； in which there is no crack； no leak on the side of the living； are anything but easy to carry through。 In the case of a murder； for instance； it can always be maintained that the medium discovers the body and the circumstances of the tragedy through the involuntary and unconscious intermediary of the murderer； even when the latter escapes prosecution and suspicion altogether。 But a recent incident； related by Dr。 Osty with the utmost precision of detail and the most scrupulous verification in the Annales des Sciences Psychiques of April； 1914； perhaps supplies us with one of those experiments which we have not been able to achieve until this day。 I give the facts in a few words。
On the 2nd of March of this year； M。 Etienne Lerasle； an old man of eighty…two； left his son's house at Cours…les…Barres （Cher） for his daily walk and was not seen again。 The house stands in the middle of a forest on Baron Jaubert's estate。 Vain searches were made in every direction for the missing man's traces； the ponds and pools were dragged to no purpose； and on the 8th of March a careful and systematical exploration of the wood； in which no fewer than twenty…four people took part； led to no result。 At last； on the 18th of March； M。 Louis Mirault； Baron Jaubert's agent； thought of applying to Dr。 Osty； and supplied him with a scarf which the old man had worn。 Dr。 Osty went to his favourite medium； Mme。 M。 He knew only one thing； that the matter concerned an old man of eighty…two； who walked with a slight stoop； and that was all。
As soon as Mme。 M had taken the scarf in her hands； she saw the dead body of an old man lying on the damp ground； in a wood； in the middle of a coppice； beside a horse…shoe pond； near a sort of rock。 She traced the road taken by the victim； depicted the buildings which he had passed； his mental condition impaired by age； his fixed intention of dying； his physical appearance； his habitual and characteristic way of carrying his stick； his soft striped shirt； and so on。
The accuracy of the description caused the greatest astonishment among the missing man's friends。 There was one detail that puzzled them a little： the mention of a rock in a part of the country that possessed none。 The search was resumed on the strength of the data supplied by the clairvoyant。 But all the rocks in a forest are more or less alike； the indications were not enough； and nothing was found。
It so happened that the second and third interviews with Mme。 M had to be postponed until the 30th of March and the 6th of April following。 At each of these sittings； the details of the vision and of the road taken became clearer and clearer and were given with startling precision； so much so that； by pursuing step by step the indications of the medium； the man's friends ended by discovering the body； dressed as stated； lying in the middle of a coppice； just as described； close to a huge stump of a tree all covered with moss； which might easily be mistaken for a rock； and on the edge of a crescent…shaped piece of water。 I may add that these particular indications applied to no other part of the wood。
6
I refer the reader to Dr。 Osty's conscientious and exhaustive article for the numerous details which I have been obliged to omit； but those which I have given are enough to show the character of this extraordinary case。 To begin with； we have one certainty which appears almost unassailable； namely； that there can be no question of a crime。 No one had the least interest in procuring the old man's death。 The body bore no marks of violence； besides； the minds of those concerned did not for a moment entertain the thought of an assault。 The poor man； whose mental derangement was known to all those about him； obsessed by the desire and thought of death； had gone quietly and obstinately to seek it in the nearest coppice。 There was therefore no criminal in the case； in other words； there was no possible or imaginable communication between the medium's subconsciousness； and that of any living person。 Hence we are compelled to admit that the communication was established with the dead man or with his subconsciousness； which continued to live for nearly a month after his death and to wander around the same places； or else we must agree that all this coming tragedy； all that the old man was about to see； do and suffer was already irrevocably contained and inscribed in the scarf at the moment when he last wore it。
In this particular case； considering that all relations with the living were definitely and undeniably severed； I can see no other explanations beyond these two。 They are both equally astounding and land us suddenly in a world of fable and enchantment which we thought that we had left for good and all。 If we do not adopt the theory of the tell…tale scarf； we must accept that of the spiritualists； who maintain that the spirits communicate with us freely。 It is possible that they may find a serious argument in this case。 But a solitary fact is not enough to support a theory； all the more so as the one in question will never be absolutely safe from the objection that could be raised if the case were one of murder； which is possible； after all； and cannot be actually disproved。 We must； therefore； while awaiting other similar and more decisive facts； if any such are conceivable； return to those which are； so to speak； laboratory facts； facts which are only denied by those who will not take the trouble to verify them； and to interpret these facts there are only the two theories which we mentioned above； before this digression； for； in these cases； which are unlike those of automatic speech or writing； we have not as a rule to consider the possibility of any intervention of the dead。 As a matter of fact； the best…known psychometers are very rarely spiritualists and claim no connection with the spirits。 They care but little； as a rule； about the source of their intuitions and seem very little interested in their exact