a vindication of the rights of woman-第53章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


he　may　dip　a　sop　in　the　milk　of　human　kindness；　to　silence　Cerberus；　and　talk　of　the　interest　which　his　heart　takes　in　an　attempt　to　make　the　earth　no　longer　cry　for　vengeance　as　it　sucks　in　its　children's　blood；　though　his　cold　hand　may　at　the　very　moment　rivet　their　chains；　by　sanctioning　the　abominable　traffick。　　A　minister　is　no　longer　a　minister　than　while　he　can　carry　a　point；　which　he　is　determined　to　carry。　　Yet　it　is　not　necessary　that　a　minister　should　feel　like　a　man；　when　a　bold　push　might　shake　his　seat。　But；　to　have　done　with　these　episodical　observations；　let　me　return　to　the　more　specious　slavery　which　chains　the　very　soul　of　woman；　keeping　her　for　ever　under　the　bondage　of　ignorance。　The　preposterous　distinctions　of　rank；　which　render　civilization　a　curse；　by　dividing　the　world　between　voluptuous　tyrants；　and　cunning　envious　dependents；　corrupt；　almost　equally；　every　class　of　people；　because　respectability　is　not　attached　to　the　discharge　of　the　relative　duties　of　life；　but　to　the　station；　and　when　the　duties　are　not　fulfilled；　the　affections　cannot　gain　sufficient　strength　to　fortify　the　virtue　of　which　they　are　the　natural　reward。　　Still　there　are　some　loop…holes　out　of　which　a　man　may　creep；　and　dare　to　think　and　act　for　himself；　but　for　a　woman　it　is　an　herculean　task；　because　she　has　difficulties　peculiar　to　her　sex　to　overcome；　which　require　almost　super…human　powers。　A　truly　benevolent　legislator　always　endeavours　to　make　it　the　interest　of　each　individual　to　be　virtuous；　and　thus　private　virtue　becoming　the　cement　of　public　happiness；　an　orderly　whole　is　consolidated　by　the　tendency　of　all　the　parts　towards　a　common　centre。　　But；　the　private　or　public　virtue　of　women　is　very　problematical；　for　Rousseau；　and　a　numerous　list　of　male　writers；　insist　that　she　should　all　her　life；　be　subjected　to　a　severe　restraint；　that　of　propriety。　　Why　subject　her　to　proprietyblind　propriety；　if　she　be　capable　of　acting　from　a　nobler　spring；　if　she　be　an　heir　of　immortality？　　Is　sugar　always　to　be　produced　by　vital　blood？　　Is　one　half　of　the　human　species；　like　the　poor　African　slaves；　to　be　subject　to　prejudices　that　brutalize　them；　when　principles　would　be　a　surer　guard　only　to　sweeten　the　cup　of　man？　Is　not　this　indirectly　to　deny　women　reason？　for　a　gift　is　a　mockery；　if　it　be　unfit　for　use。　Women　are　in　common　with　men；　rendered　weak　and　luxurious　by　the　relaxing　pleasures　which　wealth　procures；　but　added　to　this；　they　are　made　slaves　to　their　persons；　and　must　render　them　alluring；　that　man　may　lend　them　his　reason　to　guide　their　tottering　steps　aright。　　Or　should　they　be　ambitious；　they　must　govern　their　tyrants　by　sinister　tricks；　for　without　rights　there　cannot　be　any　incumbent　duties。　　The　laws　respecting　woman；　which　I　mean　to　discuss　in　a　future　part；　make　an　absurd　unit　of　a　man　and　his　wife；　and　then；　by　the　easy　transition　of　only　considering　him　as　responsible；　she　is　reduced　to　a　mere　cypher。　The　being　who　discharges　the　duties　of　its　station；　is　independent；　and；　speaking　of　women　at　large；　their　first　duty　is　to　themselves　as　rational　creatures；　and　the　next；　in　point　of　importance；　as　citizens；　is　that；　which　includes　so　many；　of　a　mother。　　The　rank　in　life　which　dispenses　with　their　fulfilling　this　duty；　necessarily　degrades　them　by　making　them　mere　dolls。　　Or；　should　they　turn　to　something　more　important　than　merely　fitting　drapery　upon　a　smooth　block；　their　minds　are　only　occupied　by　some　soft　platonic　attachment；　or；　the　actual　management　of　an　intrigue　may　keep　their　thoughts　in　motion；　for　when　they　neglect　domestic　duties；　they　have　it　not　in　their　power　to　take　the　field　and　march　and　counter…march　like　soldiers；　or　wrangle　in　the　senate　to　keep　their　faculties　from　rusting。　I　know；　that　as　a　proof　of　the　inferiority　of　the　sex；　Rousseau　has　exultingly　exclaimed；　How　can　they　leave　the　nursery　for　the　camp！　And　the　camp　has　by　some　moralists　been　termed　the　school　of　the　most　heroic　virtues；　though；　I　think；　it　would　puzzle　a　keen　casuist　to　prove　the　reasonableness　of　the　greater　number　of　wars；　that　have　dubbed　heroes。　　I　do　not　mean　to　consider　this　question　critically；　because；　having　frequently　viewed　these　freaks　of　ambition　as　the　first　natural　mode　of　civilization；　when　the　ground　must　be　torn　up；　and　the　woods　cleared　by　fire　and　sword；　I　do　not　choose　to　call　them　pests；　but　surely　the　present　system　of　war；　has　little　connection　with　virtue　of　any　denomination；　being　rather　the　school　of　FINESSE　and　effeminacy；　than　of　fortitude。　Yet；　if　defensive　war；　the　only　justifiable　war；　in　the　present　advanced　state　of　society；　where　virtue　can　show　its　face　and　ripen　amidst　the　rigours　which　purify　the　air　on　the　mountain's　top；　were　alone　to　be　adopted　as　just　and　glorious；　the　true　heroism　of　antiquity　might　again　animate　female　bosoms。　　But　fair　and　softly；　gentle　reader；　male　or　female；　do　not　alarm　thyself；　for　though　I　have　contrasted　the　character　of　a　modern　soldier　with　that　of　a　civilized　woman；　I　am　not　going　to　advise　them　to　turn　their　distaff　into　a　musket；　though　I　sincerely　wish　to　see　the　bayonet　converted　into　a　pruning　hook。　　I　only　recreated　an　imagination；　fatigued　by　contemplating　the　vices　and　follies　which　all　proceed　from　a　feculent　stream　of　wealth　that　has　muddied　the　pure　rills　of　natural　affection；　by　supposing　that　society　will　some　time　or　other　be　so　constituted；　that　man　must　necessarily　fulfil　the　duties　of　a　citizen；　or　be　despised；　and　that　while　he　was　employed　in　any　of　the　departments　of　civil　life；　his　wife；　also　an　active　citizen；　should　be　equally　intent　to　manage　her　family；　educate　her　children；　and　assist　her　neighbours。　But；　to　render　her　really　virtuous　and　useful；　she　must　not；　if　she　discharge　her　civil　duties；　want；　individually；　the　protection　of　civil　laws；　she　must　not　be　dependent　on　her　husband's　bounty　for　her　subsistence　during　his　life；　or　support　after　his　deathfor　how　can　a　being　be　generous　who　has　nothing　of　its　own？　or；　virtuous；　who　is　not　free？　　The　wife；　in　the　present　state　of　things；　who　is　faithful　to　her　husband；　and　neither　suckles　nor　educates　her　children；　scarcely　deserves　the　name　of　a　wife；　and　has　no　right　to　that　of　a　citizen。　　But　take　away　natural　rights；　and　there　is　of　course　an　end　of　duties。　Women　thus　infallibly　become　only　the　wanton　solace　of　men；　when　they　are　so　weak　in　mind　and　body；　that　they　cannot　exert　themselves；　unless　to　pursue　some　frothy　pleasure；　or　to　invent　some　frivolous　fashion。　　What　can　be　a　more　melancholy　sight　to　a　thinking　mind；　than　to　look　into　the　numerous　carriages　that　drive　helter…skelter　about　this　metropolis　in　a　morning；　full　of　pale…faced　creatures　who　are　flying　from　themselves。　　I　have　often　wished；　with　Dr。　Johnson；　to　place　some　of　them　in　a　little　shop；　with　half　a　dozen　children　looking　up　to　their　languid　countenances　for　support。　　I　am　much　mistaken；　if　some　latent　vigour　would　not　soon　give　health　and　spirit　to　their　eyes；　and　some　lines　drawn　by　the　exercise　of　reason　on　the　blank　cheeks；　which　before　were　only　undulated　by　dimples；　might　restore　lost　dignity　to　the　character；　or　rather　enable　it　to　attain　the　true　dignity　of　its　nature。　Virtue　is　not　to　be　acquired