按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
together； place a plough and some seed on fertile soil； enter a smithy； light the fire； and shut up the shop；you will produce nothing。 The following remark was made by an economist who possessed more good sense than most of his fellows： 〃Say credits capital with an active part unwarranted by its nature； left to itself； it is an idle tool。〃 （J。 Droz： Political Economy。）
Finally； labor and capital together； when unfortunately combined； produce nothing。 Plough a sandy desert； beat the water of the rivers； pass type through a sieve；you will get neither wheat； nor fish； nor books。 Your trouble will be as fruitless as was the immense labor of the army of Xerxes； who； as Herodotus says； with his three million soldiers； scourged the Hellespont for twenty…four hours； as a punishment for having broken and scattered the pontoon bridge which the great king had thrown across it。
Tools and capital； land and labor； considered individually and abstractly； are not； literally speaking； productive。 The proprietor who asks to be rewarded for the use of a tool； or the productive power of his land； takes for granted； then； that which is radically false； namely； that capital produces by its own effort；and； in taking pay for this imaginary product； he literally receives something for nothing。
OBJECTION。But if the blacksmith； the wheelwright； all manufacturers in short； have a right to the products in return for the implements which they furnish； and if land is an implement of production；why does not this implement entitle its proprietor； be his claim real or imaginary； to a portion of the products； as in the case of the manufacturers of ploughs and wagons？
REPLY。Here we touch the heart of the question； the mystery of property； which we must clear up； if we would understand any thing of the strange effects of the right of increase。
He who manufactures or repairs the farmer's tools receives the price ONCE； either at the time of delivery； or in several payments； and when this price is once paid to the manufacturer； the tools which he has delivered belong to him no more。 Never does he claim double payment for the same tool； or the same job of repairs。 If he annually shares in the products of the farmer； it is owing to the fact that he annually makes something for the farmer。
The proprietor； on the contrary； does not yield his implement； eternally he is paid for it； eternally he keeps it。
In fact； the rent received by the proprietor is not intended to defray the expense of maintaining and repairing the implement； this expense is charged to the borrower； and does not concern the proprietor except as he is interested in the preservation of the article。 If he takes it upon himself to attend to the repairs； he takes care that the money which he expends for this purpose is repaid。
This rent does not represent the product of the implement； since of itself the implement produces nothing； we have just proved this； and we shall prove it more clearly still by its consequences。
Finally； this rent does not represent the participation of the proprietor in the production； since this participation could consist； like that of the blacksmith and the wheelwright； only in the surrender of the whole or a part of his implement； in which case he would cease to be its proprietor； which would involve a contradiction of the idea of property。
Then； between the proprietor and his tenant there is no exchange either of values or services； then； as our axiom says； farm…rent is real increase；an extortion based solely upon fraud and violence on the one hand； and weakness and ignorance upon the other。 PRODUCTS say the economists； ARE BOUGHT ONLY BY PRODUCTS。 This maxim is property's condemnation。 The proprietor； producing neither by his own labor nor by his implement； and receiving products in exchange for nothing； is either a parasite or a thief。 Then； if property can exist only as a right； property is impossible。
COROLLARIES。1。 The republican constitution of 1793； which defined property as 〃the right to enjoy the fruit of one's labor；〃 was grossly mistaken。 It should have said； 〃Property is the right to enjoy and dispose at will of another's goods；the fruit of another's industry and labor。〃
2。 Every possessor of lands； houses； furniture； machinery； tools； money； &c。； who lends a thing for a price exceeding the cost of repairs （the repairs being charged to the lender； and representing products which he exchanges for other products）； is guilty of swindling and extortion。 In short； all rent received （nominally as damages； but really as payment for a loan） is an act of property；a robbery。
HISTORICAL COMMENT。The tax which a victorious nation levies upon a conquered nation is genuine farm…rent。 The seigniorial rights abolished by the Revolution of 1789；tithes； mortmain； statute…labor； &c。；were different forms of the rights of property； and they who under the titles of nobles； seigneurs； prebendaries； &c。 enjoyed these rights； were neither more nor less than proprietors。 To defend property to… day is to condemn the Revolution。
SECOND PROPOSITION。
Property is impossible because wherever it exists Production costs more than it is worth。
The preceding proposition was legislative in its nature； this one is economical。 It serves to prove that property； which originates in violence； results in waste。
〃Production；〃 says Say； 〃is exchange on a large scale。 To render the exchange productive the value of the whole amount of service must be balanced by the value of the product。 If this condition is not complied with； the exchange is unequal； the producer gives more than he receives。〃
Now； value being necessarily based upon utility； it follows that every useless product is necessarily valueless；that it cannot be exchanged； and； consequently； that it cannot be given in payment for productive services。
Then； though production may equal consumption； it never can exceed it； for there is no real production save where there is a production of utility； and there is no utility save where there is a possibility of consumption。 Thus； so much of every product as is rendered by excessive abundance inconsumable； becomes useless； valueless； unexchangeable；consequently； unfit to be given in payment for any thing whatever； and is no longer a product。
Consumption； on the other hand； to be legitimate；to be true consumption；must be reproductive of utility； for； if it is unproductive； the products which it destroys are cancelled valuesthings produced at a pure loss； a state of things which causes products to depreciate in value。 Man has the power to destroy； but he consumes only that which he reproduces。 Under a right system of economy； there is then an equation between production and consumption。
These points established； let us suppose a community of one thousand families； enclosed in a territory of a given circumference； and deprived of foreign intercourse。 Let this community represent the human race； which； scattered over the face of the earth； is really isolated。 In fact； the difference between a community and the human race being only a numerical one； the economical results will be absolutely the same in each case。
Suppose；