按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
and its approaching death； we shall definitively establish its identity with robbery。 And； after having shown that these three prejudicesTHE SOVEREIGNTY OF MAN； THE INEQUALITY OF CONDITIONS； AND PROPERTYare one and the same； that they may be taken for each other； and are reciprocally convertible；we shall have no trouble in inferring therefrom； by the principle of contradiction； the basis of government and right。 There our investigations will end； reserving the right to continue them in future works。
The importance of the subject which engages our attention is recognized by all minds。
〃Property；〃 says M。 Hennequin； 〃is the creative and conservative principle of civil society。 Property is one of those basic institutions； new theories concerning which cannot be presented too soon； for it must not be forgotten； and the publicist and statesman must know； that on the answer to the question whether property is the principle or the result of social order； whether it is to be considered as a cause or an effect； depends all morality； and； consequently； all the authority of human institutions。〃
These words are a challenge to all men of hope and faith； but； although the cause of equality is a noble one； no one has yet picked up the gauntlet thrown down by the advocates of property； no one has been courageous enough to enter upon the struggle。 The spurious learning of haughty jurisprudence； and the absurd aphorisms of a political economy controlled by property have puzzled the most generous minds； it is a sort of password among the most influential friends of liberty and the interests of the people that EQUALITY IS A CHIMERA！ So many false theories and meaningless analogies influence minds otherwise keen； but which are unconsciously controlled by popular prejudice。 Equality advances every dayfit aequalitas。 Soldiers of liberty； shall we desert our flag in the hour of triumph？
A defender of equality； I shall speak without bitterness and without anger； with the independence becoming a philosopher； with the courage and firmness of a free man。 May I； in this momentous struggle； carry into all hearts the light with which I am filled； and show； by the success of my argument； that equality failed to conquer by the sword only that it might conquer by the pen！
CHAPTER II。 PROPERTY CONSIDERED AS A NATURAL RIGHT。OCCUPATION AND CIVIL LAW AS EFFICIENT BASES OF PROPERTY。 DEFINITIONS。
The Roman law defined property as the right to use and abuse one's own within the limits of the lawjus utendi et abutendi re sua； guatenus juris ratio patitur。 A justification of the word ABUSE has been attempted； on the ground that it signifies； not senseless and immoral abuse； but only absolute domain。 Vain distinction！ invented as an excuse for property； and powerless against the frenzy of possession； which it neither prevents nor represses。 The proprietor may； if he chooses； allow his crops to rot under foot； sow his field with salt； milk his cows on the sand； change his vineyard into a desert； and use his vegetable… garden as a park： do these things constitute abuse； or not？ In the matter of property； use and abuse are necessarily indistinguishable。
According to the Declaration of Rights； published as a preface to the Constitution of '93； property is 〃the right to enjoy and dispose at will of one's goods； one's income； and the fruit of one's labor and industry。〃
Code Napoleon； article 544： 〃Property is the right to enjoy and dispose of things in the most absolute manner； provided we do not overstep the limits prescribed by the laws and regulations。〃
These two definitions do not differ from that of the Roman law： all give the proprietor an absolute right over a thing； and as for the restriction imposed by the code；PROVIDED WE DO NOT OVERSTEP THE LIMITS PRESCRIBED BY THE LAWS AND REGULATIONS；its object is not to limit property； but to prevent the domain of one proprietor from interfering with that of another。 That is a confirmation of the principle； not a limitation of it。
There are different kinds of property： 1。 Property pure and simple； the dominant and seigniorial power over a thing； or； as they term it； NAKED PROPERTY。 2。 POSSESSION。 〃Possession；〃 says Duranton； 〃is a matter of fact； not of right。〃 Toullier： 〃Property is a right； a legal power； possession is a fact。〃 The tenant； the farmer； the commandite'； the usufructuary； are possessors； the owner who lets and lends for use； the heir who is to come into possession on the death of a usufructuary； are proprietors。 If I may venture the comparison： a lover is a possessor； a husband is a proprietor。
This double definition of propertydomain and possession is of the highest importance； and it must be clearly understood； in order to comprehend what is to follow。
From the distinction between possession and property arise two sorts of rights： the jus in re； the right in a thing； the right by which I may reclaim the property which I have acquired； in whatever hands I find it； and the jus ad rem； the right TO a thing； which gives me a claim to become a proprietor。 Thus the right of the partners to a marriage over each other's person is the jus in re； that of two who are betrothed is only the jus ad rem。 In the first； possession and property are united； the second includes only naked property。 With me who； as a laborer； have a right to the possession of the products of Nature and my own industry；and who； as a proletaire； enjoy none of them；it is by virtue of the jus ad rem that I demand admittance to the jus in re。
This distinction between the jus in re and the jus ad rem is the basis of the famous distinction between possessoire and petitoire；actual categories of jurisprudence； the whole of which is included within their vast boundaries。 Petitoire refers to every thing relating to property； possessoire to that relating to possession。 In writing this memoir against property； I bring against universal society an action petitoire： I prove that those who do not possess to…day are proprietors by the same title as those who do possess； but； instead of inferring therefrom that property should be shared by all； I demand； in the name of general security； its entire abolition。 If I fail to win my case； there is nothing left for us （the proletarian class and myself） but to cut our throats： we can ask nothing more from the justice of nations； for； as the code of procedure （art 26） tells us in its energetic style； THE PLAINTIFF WHO HAS BEEN NON…SUITED IN AN ACTION PETITOIRE； IS DEBARRED THEREBY FROM BRINGING AN ACTION POSSESSOIRE。 If； on the contrary； I gain the case； we must then commence an action possessoire； that we may be reinstated in the enjoyment of the wealth of which we are deprived by property。 I hope that we shall not be forced to that extremity； but these two actions cannot be prosecuted at once； such a course being prohibited by the same code of procedure。
Before going to the heart of the question； it will not be useless to offer a few preliminary remarks。
％ 1。Property as a Natural Right。
The Declaration of Rights has placed property in its list of the natural and inalienable rights of man； four in all： LIBERTY； EQUALITY； PROPERTY； SECURITY。