按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
uthoritate liceat？ Nulli certe quamdiu rex manet。 Semper enim ex divinis id obstat； Regem honorificato； & qui potestati resistit； Dei ordinationi resisit： non alias igitur in eum populo potestas est quam si id committat propter quod ipso jure rex esse desinat。 Tunc enim se ipse principatu exuit atque in privatis constituit liber： hoc modo populus & superior efficitur； reverso ad eum sc。 jure illo quod ante regem inauguratum in interregno habuit。 At sunt paucorum generum commissa ejusmodi quae hunc effectum pariunt。 At ego cum plurima animo perlustrem； duo tantum invenio； duos； inquam； casus quibus rex ipso facto ex rege non regem se facit & omni honore & dignitate regali atque in subditos potestate destituit； quorum etiam meminit Winzerus。 Horum unus est； Si regnum disperdat； quemadmodum de Nerone fertur； quod is nempe senatum populumque Romanum； atque adeo urbem ipsam ferro flammaque vastare； ac novas sibi sedes quaerere decrevisset。 Et de Caligula； quod palam denunciarit se neque civem neque principem senatui amplius fore； inque animo habuerit interempto utriusque ordinis electissimo quoque Alexandriam commigrare； ac ut populum uno ictu interimeret； unam ei cervicem optavit。 Talia cum rex aliquis meditator & molitur serio； omnem regnandi curam & animum ilico abjicit； ac proinde imperium in subditos amittit； ut dominus servi pro derelicto habiti dominium。 Sec。 236。 Alter casus est； Si rex in alicujus clientelam se contulit； ac regnum quod liberum a majoribus & populo traditum accepit； alienae ditioni mancipavit。 Nam tunc quamvis forte non ea mente id agit populo plane ut incommodet： tamen quia quod praecipuum est regiae dignitatis amifit； ut summus scilicet in regno secundum Deum sit； & solo Deo inferior； atque populum etiam totum ignorantem vel invitum； cujus libertatem sartam & tectam conservare debuit； in alterius gentis ditionem & potestatem dedidit； hac velut quadam regni ab alienatione effecit； ut nec quod ipse in regno imperium habuit retineat； nec in eum cui collatum voluit； juris quicquam transferat； atque ita eo facto liberum jam & suae potestatis populum relinquit； cujus rei exemplum unum annales Scotici suppeditant。 Barclay contra Monarchom。 1。 iii。 c。 16。
Which in English runs thus：
Sec。 237。 What then； can there no case happen wherein the people may of right； and by their own authority； help themselves； take arms； and set upon their king； imperiously domineering over them？ None at all； whilst he remains a king。 Honour the king； and he that resists the power； resists the ordinance of God； are divine oracles that will never permit it； The people therefore can never come by a power over him； unless he does something that
makes him cease to be a king： for then he divests himself of his crown and dignity； and returns to the state of a private man； and the people become free and superior； the power which they had in the interregnum； before they crowned him king； devolving to them again。 But there are but few miscarriages which bring the matter to this state。 After considering it well on all sides； I can find but two。 Two cases there are； I say； whereby a king； ipso facto； becomes no king； and loses all power and regal authority over his people； which are also taken notice of by Winzerus。 The first is； If he endeavour to overturn the government； that is； if he have a purpose and design to ruin the kingdom and commonwealth； as it is recorded of Nero； that he resolved to cut off the senate and people of Rome； lay the city waste with fire and sword； and then remove to some other place。 And of Caligula； that he openly declared； that he would be no longer a head to the people or senate； and that he had it in his thoughts to cut off the worthiest men of both ranks； and then retire to Alexandria： and he wisht that the people had but one neck； that he might dispatch them all at a blow； Such designs as these； when any king harbours in his thoughts； and seriously promotes； he immediately gives up all care and thought of the common…wealth； and consequently forfeits the power of governing his subjects； as a master does the dominion over his slaves whom he hath abandoned。 Sec。 238。 The other case is； When a king makes himself the dependent of another； and subjects his kingdom which his ancestors left him； and the people put free into his hands； to the dominion of another： for however perhaps it may not be his intention to prejudice the people； yet because he has hereby lost the principal part of regal dignity； viz。 to be next and immediately under God； supreme in his kingdom； and also because he betrayed or forced his people； whose liberty he ought to have carefully preserved； into the power and dominion of a foreign nation。 By this； as。 it were； alienation of his kingdom； he himself loses the power he had in it before； without transferring any the least right to those on whom he would have bestowed it； and so by this act sets the people free； and leaves them at their own disposal。 One example of this is to be found in the Scotch Annals。 Sec。 239。 In these cases Barclay； the great champion of absolute monarchy； is forced to allow； that a king may be resisted； and ceases to be a king。 That is； in short； not to multiply cases； in whatsoever he has no authority； there he is no king； and may be resisted： for wheresoever the authority ceases； the king ceases too； and becomes like other men who have no authority。 And these two cases he instances in； differ little from those above mentioned； to be destructive to governments； only that he has omitted the principle from which his doctrine flows： and that is； the breach of trust； in not preserving the form of government agreed on； and in not intending the end of government itself； which is the public good and preservation of property。 When a king has dethroned himself； and put himself in a state of war with his people； what shall hinder them from prosecuting him who is no king； as they would any other man； who has put himself into a state of war with them； Barclay； and those of his opinion； would do well to tell us。 This farther I desire may be taken notice of out of Barclay； that he says； The mischief that is designed them； the people may prevent before it be clone： whereby he allows resistance when tyranny is but in design。 Such designs as these （says he） when any king harbours in his thoughts and seriously promotes； he immediately gives up all care and thought of the common…wealth； so that； according to him； the neglect of the public good is to be taken as an evidence of such design； or at least for a sufficient cause of resistance。 And the reason of all； he gives in these words； Because he betrayed or forced his people； whose liberty he ought carefully to have preserved。 What he adds； into the power and dominion of a
foreign nation； signifies nothing； the fault and forfeiture lying in the loss of their liberty； which he ought to have preserved； and not in any distinction of the persons to whose dominion they were subjected。 The peoples right is equally invaded； and their liberty lost； whether they are made sla