按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
age； and paid him tribute all this time。
CHAP。 XVII。
Of USURPATION。
Sec。 197。 AS conquest may be called a foreign usurpation； so usurpation is a kind of domestic conquest； with this difference； that an usurper can never have right on his side； it being no usurpation； but where one is got into the possession of what another has right to。 This； so far as it is usurpation； is a change only of persons； but not of the forms and rules of the government： for if the usurper extend his power beyond what of right belonged to the lawful princes； or governors of the commonwealth； it is tyranny added to usurpation。 Sec。 198。 In all lawful governments； the designation of the persons； who are to bear rule； is as natural and necessary a part
as the form of the government itself； and is that which had its establishment originally from the people； the anarchy being much alike； to have no form of government at all； or to agree； that it shall be monarchical； but to appoint no way to design the person that shall have the power； and be the monarch。 Hence all commonwealths； with the form of government established； have rules also of appointing those who are to have any share in the public authority； and settled methods of conveying the right to them： for the anarchy is much alike； to have no form of government at all； or to agree that it shall be monarchical； but to appoint no way to know or design the person that shall have the power； and be the monarch。 Whoever gets into the exercise of any part of the power； by other ways than what the laws of the community have prescribed； hath no right to be obeyed； though the form of the commonwealth be still preserved； since he is not the person the laws have appointed； and consequently not the person the people have consented to。 Nor can such an usurper； or any deriving from him； ever have a title； till the people are both at liberty to consent； and have actually consented to allow； and confirm in him the power he hath till then usurped。
CHAP。 XVIII。
Of TYRANNY。
Sec。 199。 AS usurpation is the exercise of power； which another hath a right to； so tyranny is the exercise of power beyond right； which no body can have a right to。 And this is making use of the power any one has in his hands； not for the good of those who are under it； but for his own private separate advantage。 When the governor； however intitled； makes not the law； but his will； the rule； and his commands and actions are not directed to the preservation of the properties of his people； but the satisfaction of his own ambition； revenge； covetousness； or any other irregular passion。 Sec。 200。 If one can doubt this to be truth； or reason； because it comes from the obscure hand of a subject； I hope the authority of a king will make it pass with him。 King James the first； in his speech to the parliament； 1603； tells them thus； I will ever prefer the weal of the public； and of the whole commonwealth； in making of good laws and constitutions； to any particular and private ends of mine； thinking ever the wealth and weal of the commonwealth to be my greatest weal and worldly felicity； a point wherein a lawful king doth directly differ from a tyrant： for I do acknowledge； that the special and greatest point of difference that is between a rightful king and an usurping tyrant； is this； that whereas the proud and ambitious tyrant doth think his kingdom and people are only ordained for satisfaction of his desires and unreasonable appetites； the righteous and just king doth by the contrary acknowledge himself to be ordained for the procuring of the wealth and property of his people； And again； in his speech to the parliament； 1609； he hath these words； The king binds himself by a double oath； to the observation of the fundamental laws of his kingdom； tacitly； as by being a king； and so bound to protect as well the people； as the laws of his kingdom； and expressly； by his oath at his coronation； so as every just king； in a settled kingdom； is bound to observe that paction made to his people； by his laws； in framing his government agreeable thereunto； according to that paction which God made with Noah after the deluge。 Hereafter； seed…time and harvest； and cold and heat； and summer and winter； and day and night； shall not cease while the earth remaineth。 And therefore a king governing in a settled kingdom； leaves to be a king； and degenerates into a tyrant； as soon as he leaves off
to rule according to his laws； And a little after； Therefore all kings that are not tyrants； or perjured； will be glad to bound themselves within the limits of their laws； and they that persuade them the contrary； are vipers； and pests both against them and the commonwealth。 Thus that learned king； who well understood the notion of things； makes the difference betwixt a king and a tyrant to consist only in this； that one makes the laws the bounds of his power； and the good of the public； the end of his government； the other makes all give way to his own will and appetite。 Sec。 201。 It is a mistake； to think this fault is proper only to monarchies； other forms of government are liable to it； as well as that： for wherever the power； that is put in any hands for the government of the people； and the preservation of their properties； is applied to other ends； and made use of to impoverish； harass； or subdue them to the arbitrary and irregular commands of those that have it； there it presently becomes tyranny； whether those that thus use it are one or many。 Thus we read of the thirty tyrants at Athens； as well as one at Syracuse； and the intolerable dominion of the Decemviri at Rome was nothing better。 Sec。 202。 Where…ever law ends； tyranny begins； if the law be transgressed to another's harm； and whosoever in authority exceeds the power given him by the law； and makes use of the force he has under his command； to compass that upon the subject； which the law allows not； ceases in that to be a magistrate； and； acting without authority； may be opposed； as any other man； who by force invades the right of another。 This is acknowledged in subordinate magistrates。 He that hath authority to seize my person in the street； may be opposed as a thief and a robber； if he endeavours to break into my house to execute a writ； notwithstanding that I know he has such a warrant； and such a legal authority； as will impower him to arrest me abroad。 And why this should not hold in the highest； as well as in the most inferior magistrate； I would gladly be informed。 Is it reasonable； that the eldest brother； because he has the greatest part of his father's estate； should thereby have a right to take away any of his younger brothers portions？ or that a rich man； who possessed a whole country； should from thence have a right to seize； when he pleased； the cottage and garden of his poor neighbour？ The being rightfully possessed of great power and riches； exceedingly beyond the greatest part of the sons of Adam； is so far from being an excuse；