按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
475 ｜ Kou Chien lays siege to the capital of Wu。
473 ｜ Final defeat and extinction of Wu。
The sentence quoted above from VI。 ss。 21 hardly strikes me
as one that could have been written in the full flush of victory。
It seems rather to imply that； for the moment at least； the tide
had turned against Wu； and that she was getting the worst of the
struggle。 Hence we may conclude that our treatise was not in
existence in 505； before which date Yueh does not appear to have
scored any notable success against Wu。 Ho Lu died in 496； so
that if the book was written for him； it must have been during
the period 505…496； when there was a lull in the hostilities； Wu
having presumably exhausted by its supreme effort against Ch‘u。
On the other hand； if we choose to disregard the tradition
connecting Sun Wu's name with Ho Lu； it might equally well have
seen the light between 496 and 494； or possibly in the period
482…473； when Yueh was once again becoming a very serious menace。
＇33＇ We may feel fairly certain that the author； whoever he may
have been； was not a man of any great eminence in his own day。
On this point the negative testimony of the TSO CHUAN far
outweighs any shred of authority still attaching to the SHIH CHI；
if once its other facts are discredited。 Sun Hsing…yen； however；
makes a feeble attempt to explain the omission of his name from
the great commentary。 It was Wu Tzu…hsu； he says； who got all
the credit of Sun Wu's exploits； because the latter （being an
alien） was not rewarded with an office in the State。
How then did the Sun Tzu legend originate？ It may be that
the growing celebrity of the book imparted by degrees a kind of
factitious renown to its author。 It was felt to be only right
and proper that one so well versed in the science of war should
have solid achievements to his credit as well。 Now the capture
of Ying was undoubtedly the greatest feat of arms in Ho Lu's
reign； it made a deep and lasting impression on all the
surrounding states； and raised Wu to the short…lived zenith of
her power。 Hence； what more natural； as time went on； than that
the acknowledged master of strategy； Sun Wu； should be popularly
identified with that campaign； at first perhaps only in the sense
that his brain conceived and planned it； afterwards； that it was
actually carried out by him in conjunction with Wu Yuan； ＇34＇ Po
P‘ei and Fu Kai？
It is obvious that any attempt to reconstruct even the
outline of Sun Tzu's life must be based almost wholly on
conjecture。 With this necessary proviso； I should say that he
probably entered the service of Wu about the time of Ho Lu's
accession； and gathered experience； though only in the capacity
of a subordinate officer； during the intense military activity
which marked the first half of the prince's reign。 ＇35＇ If he
rose to be a general at all； he certainly was never on an equal
footing with the three above mentioned。 He was doubtless present
at the investment and occupation of Ying； and witnessed Wu's
sudden collapse in the following year。 Yueh's attack at this
critical juncture； when her rival was embarrassed on every side；
seems to have convinced him that this upstart kingdom was the
great enemy against whom every effort would henceforth have to be
directed。 Sun Wu was thus a well…seasoned warrior when he sat
down to write his famous book； which according to my reckoning
must have appeared towards the end； rather than the beginning of
Ho Lu's reign。 The story of the women may possibly have grown
out of some real incident occurring about the same time。 As we
hear no more of Sun Wu after this from any source； he is hardly
likely to have survived his patron or to have taken part in the
death…struggle with Yueh； which began with the disaster at Tsui…
li。
If these inferences are approximately correct； there is a
certain irony in the fate which decreed that China's most
illustrious man of peace should be contemporary with her greatest
writer on war。
The Text of Sun Tzu
…
I have found it difficult to glean much about the history of
Sun Tzu's text。 The quotations that occur in early authors go to
show that the 〃13 chapters〃 of which Ssu…ma Ch‘ien speaks were
essentially the same as those now extant。 We have his word for
it that they were widely circulated in his day； and can only
regret that he refrained from discussing them on that account。
Sun Hsing…yen says in his preface：
During the Ch‘in and Han dynasties Sun Tzu's ART OF WAR
was in general use amongst military commanders； but they seem
to have treated it as a work of mysterious import； and were
unwilling to expound it for the benefit of posterity。 Thus
it came about that Wei Wu was the first to write a commentary
on it。
As we have already seen； there is no reasonable ground to
suppose that Ts‘ao Kung tampered with the text。 But the text
itself is often so obscure； and the number of editions which
appeared from that time onward so great； especially during the
T‘ang and Sung dynasties； that it would be surprising if numerous
corruptions had not managed to creep in。 Towards the middle of
the Sung period； by which time all the chief commentaries on Sun
Tzu were in existence； a certain Chi T‘ien…pao published a work
in 15 CHUAN entitled 〃Sun Tzu with the collected commentaries of
ten writers。〃 There was another text； with variant readings put
forward by Chu Fu of Ta…hsing； which also had supporters among
the scholars of that period； but in the Ming editions； Sun Hsing…
yen tells us； these readings were for some reason or other no
longer put into circulation。 Thus； until the end of the 18th
century； the text in sole possession of the field was one derived
from Chi T‘ien…pao's edition； although no actual copy of that
important work was known to have survived。 That； therefore； is
the text of Sun Tzu which appears in the War section of the great
Imperial encyclopedia printed in 1726； the KU CHIN T‘U SHU CHI
CH‘ENG。 Another copy at my disposal of what is practically the
same text； with slight variations； is that contained in the
〃Eleven philosophers of the Chou and Ch‘in dynasties〃 ＇1758＇。
And the Chinese printed in Capt。 Calthrop's first edition is
evidently a similar version which has filtered through Japanese
channels。 So things remained until Sun Hsing…yen ＇1752…1818＇； a
distinguished antiquarian and classical scholar； who claimed to
be an actual descendant of Sun Wu； ＇36＇ accidentally discovered a
copy of Chi T‘ien…pao's long…lost work； when on a visit to the
library of the Hua…yin temple。 ＇37＇ Appended to it was the I
SHUO of Cheng Yu…Hsien； mentioned in the T‘UNG CHIH； and also
believed to have perished。 This is what Sun Hsing…yen designates
as the 〃original edition （or text）〃 a rather misleading name；