友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
热门书库 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

心理学与生活-第156章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



to have the power to elicit powerful biological responses。 

Following the demonstration; you should be sure that the class understands the significance of the research 
on conditioning of drug responses–and lethal overdoses–as one “real…world” consequence。 

PROCEDURE 

Materials 

。 One can of sweetened lemonade powder (such as Minute Maid)。 
。 Small paper cups; one per student; of the kind used for ketchup and mustard in some cafeterias。 
。 Pour enough of the lemonade powder in each cup so that a student can taste some on each of about 
70 conditioning trials。 (Try it first yourself to determine the approximate amount。) 
Method 

1。 Tell students to moisten the tip of the index finger of their preferred hand and watch for the
instructor to signal them to “Dip。”
2。 At the visual cue of the instructor pointing down; students dip their moistened fingers in the 
lemonade powder and put a small amount of it on their tongues。 
3。 The CS is the spoken name “Pavlov” said between (0。5 and 1。5 seconds) prior to the “Dip” signal。 
4。 These conditioning trials are spaced at intervals of 10 to 15 seconds。 
393 


5。 Test trials are given after 8 to 12 conditioning trials。 In a test trial; instead of the “Dip” signal; the 
instructor holds up a card with the word “Experience?” Students are not to taste the lemonade 
powder (US) but are to experience if they salivated after “Pavlov” and without the US。 Get a show 
of hands of those who did salivate and record it as a percentage of the class giving a conditioned 
response。 
6。 The same results are obtained with eyes opened or closed during test trials。 
7。 After most of the class shows acquisition (80 to 100 percent of the class); start extinction training by 
withholding the “Dip” lemonade tasting procedure; instead; all trials are test trials “Pavlov”— 
Experience? 
8。 Have each student write down how strong the salivary response he or she experienced on the 
conditioning trials was pared to the lemonade trials。 Also; inquire about the taste sensation; 
physical response (“puckering”); and any cognitive responses (e。g。; actively trying not to be 
conditioned by thinking of something else)。 
DATA ANALYSIS 

1。 Plot the acquisition and extinction data。 
2。 Add water and ice to remaining crystals and pause for refreshment。 
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES 

Gibbs; G。 D。 (1983)。 Making Classical Conditioning Understandable through Demonstration Technique。 Teaching of 
Psychology; 10; 112…113。 

Pavlov; I。 P。 (1928)。 Conditioned Reflexes (W。 H。 Grant; Trans。)。 New York: International。 

394 


STRATEGIES FOR ENHANCING MEMORY 

OBJECTIVES 

1。 To discuss some of the ways in which memory operates in everyday life。 
2。 To consider how memory can be systematically distorted。 
3。 To demonstrate some of the ways in which memory can be improved。 
4。 To perform a within…subject experiment on immediate versus delayed recall as a function of depth 
of processing。 
OVERVIEW 

The issue of memory and memory enhancement is inherently interesting。 To what extent are differences in 
test performance between students a function of difference in their memory capacity? To what extent can 
this capacity be expanded? In this section we will: 

1。 Begin by going around the room and sharing (a) our earliest memories and (b) the most important 
thing we have ever forgotten。 
2。 Discuss how it is that we know those events actually took place。 What are validity checks on 
memory? 
3 。 Determine which students remembered to bring in a previously suggested item (e。g。; idea cards; if 
they are being used)。 Ask those students who remembered to bring in the item what devices they 
used to facilitate their recall; and ask those students who forgot the item why they believe their 
memory failed。 
4。 Review a variety of strategies for improving memory。 
5。 Conduct one or both of the demonstrations on memory enhancement。 
GENERAL INTRODUCTION 

Memory has long been of interest to psychologists and philosophers。 William James said the only thing that 

distinguishes memory from other mental processes (perception; imagination; reasoning; etc。) is the belief 
that the given event actually occurred in the past。 In his novel; 1984; George Orwell described techniques to 
destroy this set of beliefs by rewriting the past to make it congruent with the present situation。 Perhaps the 
most famous injunction about memory is philosopher George Santayana’s reminder that “Those who forget 
the past are condemned to repeat it。” It is possible at this point to mention some instances of “social 
amnesia;” such as the holocaust in Germany; the internment of Japanese American citizens in U。S。 
concentration camps during World War II; or; more recently; the Jonestown massacre。 More typical 
examples of memory distortion from psychological literature es from Bartlett’s classic study of “The 
War of the Ghosts;” Allport and Postman’s study of rumor transmission; and Loftus’ recent demonstrations 
of the unreliability of eyewitness testimony。 

mon to all these examples is the susceptibility of memory to distortion。 However; the emphasis in this 
demonstration will be on ways to improve the accuracy of memory。 The earliest known account of memory 
enhancement es from the Latin writer Cicero; who tells a story of how Simonides was able to recall the 
identities of a large number of banquet guests who were accidentally killed and mutilated beyond 
recognition。 He did so by associating each guest with the place; or locus; at which he or she had been 
sitting。 This mnemonic device later became known as the method of loci。 Other memory enhancement 

strategies; many of which have been popularized by Lorayne and Lucas in The Memory Book include: 

1。 Associating what is to be remembered with what is already known–in some ridiculous way。 In 
using this technique to remember who wrote “The War of the Ghosts;” for example; one might 
395 


imagine a ghost munching on a Bartlett apple。 

2。 Exaggerating the size; number; or some other characteristic of what is to be remembered。 For 
example; one might remember to buy apples at the supermarket by imagining a shopping cart 
brimming over with apples。 
3。 Replacing abstract labels with vivid; concrete images whose names sound similar to the original 
thing to be remembered。 The name “Zimbardo” might therefore be remembered as “sitar show;” 
“limb cargo;” or “Z embargo;” while Joe Smith bees “Joe’s mitt。” 
4。 Substituting vivid; similar…sounding images for the original items to be remembered and linking 
these images together in a coherent story (see American States Demonstration below)。 This 
mnemonic technique has been called “narrative chaining”。 
Narrative chaining is curious because in one sense it ought not to work; the learner’s task is to recall a given 
amount of material by putting it in a context that requires first learning a much greater amount of material。 
The following experiment is designed to test the validity of the assertion that memory can be enhanced 
through learning with the narrative chaining method。 

PROCEDURE FOR BRIEF “AMERIC
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!